Category Archives: White House Review

White House Review

Donald Trump: We now have TWO opponents…

We’re not just fighting against Hillary Clinton…

We are running against the very dishonest and totally biased media!

It’s time to hold the media accountable for trying to rig this election against us.

All too often I’m asked about a “poll” put out by a liberal organization that says the American people disagree with our common-sense reforms to fix our country.

Since Day ONE, the media has written off this campaign. They said we were doomed.

But together, you and I proved the pundits wrong and ended up getting more votes than ANY Republican candidate in the history of our Party.

And you know what?

Every time I see one more biased report from the dishonest media, I’m reminded that we’re on the RIGHT side of this fight.

Hillary Clinton STILL can’t admit that she lied about sending classified top-secret emails and that she deleted 3O,OOO to cover her tracks.

Can you imagine if I set up a secret server, stored top secret information on it, jeopardized our national security, deleted 3O,OOO records, LIED about it, and then used the defense that my brain “short-circuited”?

The media would single-handedly destroy our campaign!

I’ve always known that the media was out to get Republicans.

But this campaign has opened my eyes to how truly biased and dishonest they are.

We cannot let the media get away with it. We MUST fight back.

Donald Trump: We’re going directly to the voters

You’ve seen it – the liberal media can’t stop telling outrageous lies about me.

They are really a disgrace to journalism, and they’re so desperate to mislead the American people about our campaign!

Yet at every stage we continue to prove them wrong, including:

— Smashing the Republican primary vote record by 1.4 MILLION votes;

— Pulling off an incredible Republican National Convention, with much higher viewership than the Democrats’ disastrous convention;

— Packing stadiums everywhere we go;

— Raising $82 million in July alone from hundreds of thousands of grassroots supporters.

Now we must continue to build on our great momentum all across the country.

We know the Clinton campaign will cheat to win – just like they did in the race for the Democrat nomination.

And we know the liberal media will continue to say and do ANYTHING to put Crooked Hillary Clinton in the White House!

I know you’ve been following this race closely. I’m sure you’re as sick and tired of their desperate lies as I am.

Day in and day out they attack me, our campaign, our Republican friends down the ticket and supporters like you all across the country…

…while giving Crooked Hillary a free pass on her terrible policies and long record of failure and cronyism!

Don’t let them get away with it – help me prove our opponents and the liberal media wrong about the Trump movement, by growing our team and WINNING on Election Day!

We’re going to reach the American people directly with our message about making better deals for our country, bringing back our jobs, and achieving a brighter future for every American.

Democrat Party worried another hacked email trove could surface before election

Democrat Party officials are bracing for the possibility that another batch of damaging or embarrassing internal emails, the kind that cost the party chairman her job on the eve of the Democrat National Convention could become public before the November presidential election.

That fear reportedly comes as officials with knowledge of a Russian cyber attack that targeted Democrat politicians and organizations told the media that the breach was bigger than first thought and exposed the private email accounts of party officials and groups including the personal email accounts of Hillary Clinton’s key campaign officials.

The apparent wider breach reportedly has prompted the FBI to broaden its investigation, and agents have begun notifying top Democrat officials that the Russians may have breached their personal accounts, the media reported.

An earlier release of emails just days before the party convention in Philadelphia cost Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz her job as party chairman, while party CEO Amy Dacey; chief finance officer Brad Marshall, and communications director Luis Miranda resigned last week.

Parents of Two Benghazi Victims Sue Hillary Clinton

Parents of two of the four Americans who were killed in the Benghazi attack in 2012 filed have a lawsuit Monday against Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, alleging recklessly handling of classified information contributed to their deaths.

The case has been filed in the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia by Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch USA on behalf of Patricia Smith, the mother of Sean Smith, and Charles Woods, the father of Tyrone Woods, for allegedly wrongfully causing the death of their sons as well as for defamation and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress.

The lawsuit suggests that Clinton’s use of a private email server contributed to the deaths of Smith and Woods, adding that terrorists were able to “obtain the whereabouts of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and thus the U.S. State Department and covert and other government operations in Benghazi, Libya and subsequently orchestrate, plan, and execute the now infamous September 11, 2012 attack.”

“Having used a secret private email server that we now know was used to communicate with Ambassador Christopher Stevens with confidential and classified government information, and which we also now know was likely hacked by hostile adversaries such as Iran, Russia, China and North Korea aligning with terrorist groups, it is clear that Hillary Clinton allegedly negligently and recklessly gave up the classified location of the plaintiffs’ sons, resulting in a deadly terrorist attack that took their lives,” Klayman said in a statement announcing the suit.

In addition to the wrongful death and negligence charges named in the suit, the parents also claim that Clinton defamed them in statements to the media, according to court documents.

“During her campaign for President, Defendant Clinton has negligently, recklessly, and/or maliciously defamed Plaintiffs by either directly calling them liars, or by strongly implying that they are liars, in order to protect and enhance her public image and intimidate and emotionally harm and silence them to not speak up about the Benghazi attack on at least four separate occasions,” Klayman wrote in his complaint.

Obama Uses Taxpayer $Resources$ For 2012 – 2016 Presidential Election Campaign

(Revisited) Barack Obama’s 2012 Presidential campaign continuously uses government resources which are paid for by tax-payers to campaign.

The Obama camp is using .gov email and hosting that are meant for Administration policy change updates to campaign to be in the White House on January 1, 2013 using terms and phrases such as New Years Eve, when the clock strikes twelve and attacking Republicans and others.

WhiteHouse.gov is reportedly paid for by taxpayers and if Obama uses the hosting with-in that domain and any other resource to promote his self it is just like when the GSA (General Services Administration) used time on-duty to make the videos and when they printed out invitations for participants to join them at their taxpayer paid convention in Las Vegas.

Not promoting Mitt Romney, but when Obama said Romney may be a felon, Obama may indeed be a felon his self.

This is happening not only with Obama and the GSA, there are many, many corrupt officials in the world that fly below the radar. Even in past elections has such failure in taxpayer resource management gone on. Today, we are at a forefront in how taxpayer dollars and resources are being used as the present economic outlook requires us that we pay more attention to these failures.

Every time Air Force One takes to the air, costs could be greater than $250,000.00. Every time an email is sent to one million email subscribers, costs could range from $20,000.00, grant that every time one email is received from whitehouse.gov to one recipient, 20 million other people may have received the same email. So we are looking at spending about $200,000.00 every time David Plouffe, Barack Obama or his First Lady chooses to use the whitehouse.gov email hosting. Three have been sent out recently, so costs could have easily been $400,000.00 if $1,000,000.00 seems to high for but still is “Taxpayer” paid for resources what ever the cost are.

It has also been found that the company which administers or hosts the whitehouse.gov website says the amount paid for the website is “Top Secret” and we could not find the cost of the website hosting, development or email. After further investigation, another website that could be reasonably developed or design for around $1,000.00 would have cost $35,000.00 by the same company who apparently hosts the whitehouse.gov website.

The amount paid for the whitehouse.gov website could range from $35,000.00 to $20,000,000.00 because whitehouse.gov is so many times more present and apparent than the other example website which was said to cost $35,000.00. Best guess is that at-least $5,000,000.00 could have been paid for the whitehouse.gov website/hosting/email and then some every day or month depending on how the service is set up. Everybody knows that the government pays more than $35,000.00 for it’s website, it’s just about guaranteed. It is guaranteed that taxpayers are paying for the whitehouse.gov website and paying for each email they send, no matter what it costs.

Why would it be “Top Secret”? Are they trying to hide something? Could it be the outrageous costs that taxpayers incur with this fleecing? Obama Uses Taxpayer $$Resources$$ For 2012 Presidential Election Campaign.

President Obama has also reportedly used taxpayer dollars to loan businesses in other countries billions of dollars that created jobs out-side the United States. A majority of stimulus money was sent to a foreign company that bought American Owned Chrysler, and created even more jobs over-seas. Stimulus money meant for to solar/wind energy programs for the United States went to foreign owned companies and again created more jobs in over-seas countries. All the while not creating enough jobs in the United States and furthering the great exchange in wealth to everyone but United States Citizens. Great mis-management of taxpayer resources like this is the reason why the United States has so much trouble economically.

For those who are saying that the United States is done for and has gone off in a hand basket, you are wrong. The United States is still the best country to live in the entire world and as long as the good ol’ U.S. of A. has patriots and folks who bleed red, white and blue, it will remain the best and there ain’t no seeing as to how your going to change many minds about that.

Just as always, every organization has an Ugly Duckling that surfaces like Obama is now to the United States but not all (U.S. Citizens) that belong to that organization are the same as that Ugly Duckling (Obama). Some of those ducks look pretty cute, in a manner of speaking (Patriotically).

Obama Uses Taxpayer Dollars To Campaign With GOV Resources

(2012 and NOW) The Barrack Obama for President re-elect camp is apparently using government resources to campaign to Internet users. They are using a .gov domain, and apparent hosting paid for by tax payer dollars. Domains cost money, smtp relays cost money, hosting for the .gov website and email costs money and everything else that has to do with the domain or website costs money.

The question is; Are tax payer dollars also paying the individual who manages the emails? We already know the rest (.gov) is paid for by using tax payer dollars.

The Barrack Obama campaign had recently been embroiled in a scandal/controversy where Obama had been using “Air Force One” as transportation to different locations to campaign. All the while, the Obama camp has been miss-using funds on the Internet promoting his camp.

Using a Jet that costs millions of dollars to fly and maintain is one thing, and the use of .gov resources is the same. Either way, “Air Force One” and “.gov” costs tax payers, not Obama.

The Obama camp has sent several campaign messages via the .gov website every month. Emails cost money especially on the scale of the government email list, the cost is maximum. “If I wanted to email 100,000 people on my server, I would have to pay extra for the 95,000 extra smtp relays and a few hundred additional relays costs me $15.00,” says Matthew Bailey a Internet Webmaster and goes on to say, “the U.S. governments list of emails where the emails originate from could number into the millions*.”

The Obama camp is plainly miss-using tax payer dollars.

$400 Million Airlifted by US to Iran as Detained Americans Released

The U.S. government airlifted the equivalent of $400 million to Iran this past January, which occurred as four detained Americans were released by Tehran.

The cash flown to Iran consisted of euros, Swiss francs, and other currencies because U.S. law forbids transacting American dollars with Iran.

The cash transfer was supposed to be the first installment paid in a $1.7 billion settlement the Obama administration reached with Iran to resolve a failed 1979 arms deal dating from just before the Iranian Revolution.

State Department spokesman John Kirby denied the cash transfer was done to secure the release of the four Americans, Washington Post reporter Jason Rezaian, Amir Hekmati, a former U.S. Marine; Christian pastor Saeed Abedini and Nosratollah Khosravi-Roodsari, whose case had not been publicized before the release.

“The negotiations over the arms deal settlement and were completely separate from the discussions about returning our American citizens home,” Kirby said in a statement. “Not only were the two negotiations separate, they were conducted by different teams on each side.”

“The funds that were transferred to Iran were related solely to the settlement of a long-standing claim at the U.S.-Iran Claims Tribunal at The Hague,” Kirby’s statement concluded.

Since the cash was airlifted, Iran’s Revolutionary Guard has arrested two more Iranian-Americans. Tehran has also detained dual-nationals from France, Canada and the U.K. in recent months.

“Paying ransom to kidnappers puts Americans even more at risk,” Sen. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., said in a statement. “While Americans were relieved by Iran’s overdue release of illegally imprisoned American hostages, the White House’s policy of appeasement has led Iran to illegally seize more American hostages.”

Barack Obama Will Announce His Supreme Court Nomination Today

Today, I will announce the person whom I believe is eminently qualified to sit on the Supreme Court.

As President, it is both my constitutional duty to nominate a Justice and one of the most important decisions that I — or any president — will make.

I’ve devoted a considerable amount of time and deliberation to this decision. I’ve consulted with legal experts and people across the political spectrum, both inside and outside government. And we’ve reached out to every member of the Senate, who each have a responsibility to do their job and take this nomination just as seriously.

Please join me in the Rose Garden at 11:00am Eastern for my announcement.

This is a responsibility I do not take lightly. In considering several candidates, I held each to three principles that reflect the role the Supreme Court plays in our democracy.

First, a Justice should possess an independent mind, unimpeachable credentials, and an unquestionable mastery of law. There is no doubt this person will face complex legal questions, so it is imperative that he or she possess a rigorous intellect that will help provide clear answers.

Second, a Justice should recognize the limits of the judiciary’s role. With a commitment to impartial justice rather than any particular ideology, the next Supreme Court Justice will understand that the job is to interpret the law, not make law.

However, I know there will be cases before the Supreme Court in which the law is not clear. In those cases, a Justice’s analysis will necessarily be shaped by his or her own perspective, ethics, and judgment.

Therefore, the third quality I looked for in a judge is a keen understanding that justice is not about abstract legal theory, nor some footnote in a dusty casebook. It’s the kind of life experience earned outside the classroom and the courtroom; experience that suggests he or she views the law not only as an intellectual exercise, but also grasps the way it affects the daily reality of people’s lives in a big, complicated democracy, and in rapidly-changing times. In my view, that’s an essential element for arriving at just decisions and fair outcomes.

Today at 11:00am Eastern, I’ll introduce you to the judge I believe meets all three of these standards.

I’m confident you’ll share my conviction that this American is not only eminently qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice, but deserves a fair hearing, and an up-or-down vote.

In putting forward a nominee today, I am fulfilling my constitutional duty. I’m doing my job. I hope that our Senators will do their jobs, and move quickly to consider my nominee. That is what the Constitution dictates, and that’s what the American people expect and deserve from their leaders.

President Barack Obama

P.S. If you’re looking for the latest on my Supreme Court nominee and the confirmation process in the Senate, check out @SCOTUSnom on Twitter. You’ll find all the facts and up-to-date information there.

Michael Bloomberg May Run As Independent For President

Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is seriously considering an independent presidential run and may make a decision in March, a source familiar with Bloomberg’s thinking told the media.

The source said Bloomberg, 73, sees the Republican and Democratic presidential races as becoming increasingly polarized, and said that neither fits Bloomberg’s views.

A spokesman for the former mayor declined to comment.

News of Bloomberg’s consideration was first reported Saturday morning by The New York Times.

Final Democrat Presidential Debate Turns Personal

The final Democrat presidential debate before voting begins quickly turned personal Sunday as Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton traded barbs on gun control and health care.

Clinton slammed Sanders for voting “with the NRA, with the gun lobby numerous times.”

But Sanders hit back hard, arguing that he had a D-minus voting rating from the National Rifle Association, and rejected her list of charges.

“I think that Secretary Clinton knows that what she says is very disingenuous,” Sanders said.